Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266962›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

HPV vaccine hesitancy among Chinese adults and its influencing factors in the context of improved vaccine accessibility.

Yanqiu Chen, Shiqi Xie, Jianrong Zhou, Hongjin Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanqiu ChenWomen and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shiqi XieSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jianrong ZhouSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hongjin ZhuWomen and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: HPV vaccination is crucial for preventing HPV-related diseases; however, vaccine hesitancy remains a global challenge. In China, given the increasing vaccine supply and optimized vaccination policies, understanding the current status and determinants of HPV vaccine hesitancy among adults is essential for improving vaccination coverage. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in China in 2024. Data were collected using a sociodemographic information form, an HPV knowledge questionnaire, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, and the WHO Vaccine Hesitancy 3Cs model. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and binary logistic regression were utilized for data analysis. Results: A total of 967 adults participated in this study. The mean age was 33.41 years (SD = 8.71), and 84.4% were women. The overall HPV vaccine hesitancy rate was 19.86%, with 26.5% in men and 18.6% in women. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that higher complacency, lower confidence and lower HPV knowledge were significant predictors of vaccine hesitancy. Conclusion: HPV vaccine hesitancy among adults is influenced by multiple factors, with higher complacency, lower confidence, and lower HPV knowledge being core issues. Future public health practices should develop personalized intervention strategies focused on improving HPV knowledge, particularly among men and older women. Concurrent efforts should be made to alleviate public complacency and rebuild vaccine confidence by disseminating scientific evidence through multiple channels to address cognitive and attitudinal barriers.

Indexed as

3C modelHPV knowledgeHPV vaccineinfluencing factorsvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID42266962
PMCPMC13243398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.