ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Resident eosinophils in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Eosinophilic inflammation is involved in approximately 20% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Research examining the role of eosinophils in the initiation and progression of COPD has yielded varying conclusions, potentially attributable to the different subtypes of eosinophils. Methods: In this prospective observational study from Jan 2025 and Jun 2025, we included 27 patients with stable COPD and 10 controls. Blood samples were collected for eosinophil isolation, and flow-cytometry analysis was used to determine the subtype of eosinophil: resident eosinophils (rEos: Siglec-8 Results: The absolute number and proportion of rEos was significantly lower in patients with stable COPD compared to healthy controls. The absolute number of rEos (cell/uL) serves as a biomarker for predicting COPD (AUC 0.856; 95% CI 0.736-0.975). A ratio below 1.955 (odds ratio 0.231; 95% CI 0.063-0.841; Conclusion: rEos levels were notably lower in stable COPD patients compared to healthy individuals and were associated with COPD presence. Future research should include larger, diverse groups in multicenter studies to confirm the role of rEos in COPD and conduct basic experiments to investigate the molecular and cellular pathways of eosinophilic phenotypes in COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.