ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Co-creating care: Involving children, young people, and families in paediatric medical device innovation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innovating in paediatric healthcare requires more than technological advancements; it demands meaningful collaboration with children and young people (CYP) and their families. This practice-focused paper demonstrates how co-creation can be embedded within paediatric medical device development by applying a rights-based approach to guide and inform the involvement activities. Drawing on three illustrative case studies from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) HealthTech Research Centre in Paediatrics and Child Health (HRC-PCH), we show how CYP and their families contributed at various stages of innovation, from early concept development to prototype refinement. Each case is examined using Lundy's Model of Participation and the 3Ps framework (Provision, Protection, and Participation), allowing us to identify practical enablers and barriers to inclusive, ethical, and rights-based involvement. The cases highlight how co-creation can enhance the relevance, usability, and acceptability of paediatric medical technologies while fostering trust, equity, and empowerment among participants. We conclude by outlining actionable, practice-based recommendations for embedding CYP and family involvement within the culture, governance, and day-to-day processes of paediatric innovation. This offers a practical roadmap for teams engaged in research, healthcare, and industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.