ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2026
Disaster risk management and SME resilience in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and evidence map.
Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in employment creation and local economic stability, yet they are highly vulnerable to disasters and operational disruptions. This study synthesises existing evidence on risk management frameworks used by SMEs in low- and middle-income countries and examines how these approaches contribute to disaster risk reduction and business continuity. A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted using major academic databases and selected grey literature covering the period 2000 to 2025. Eligible studies examined the application or adaptation of structured risk management approaches, including enterprise risk management, business continuity management and related frameworks in SME contexts. The search identified 2 640 records, of which 76 studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that simplified versions of internationally recognised frameworks, particularly ISO-aligned risk management, COSO-based enterprise risk management and business continuity toolkits, are most frequently adopted by SMEs. Across sectors and regions, these approaches are associated with improved preparedness, increased risk awareness and shorter recovery times following disruptions. However, evidence linking adoption to sustained financial performance or long-term resilience remains limited. The review also highlights important gaps in the evidence base, including limited use of causal research designs, reliance on self-reported measures and the underrepresentation of micro, informal and women-owned enterprises. Contribution: Despite these limitations, the findings suggest that proportionate and context-sensitive practices can strengthen SME preparedness and recovery capacity. Policymakers and support institutions should promote accessible guidance, phased adoption pathways and practical continuity tools to better integrate SME resilience into local disaster risk reduction strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.