ArticleJournal of liver transplantation2025
A statistical model to determine the optimal bone mineral density (BMD) screening schedule in liver transplant recipients.
Article in Journal of liver transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vertebral trabecular attenuation serial changes on chest CT after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Liver transplantation-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures: pathogenic pathways, risk stratification and novel targeted therapy advances.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the American Society of Transplantation (AST) 2012 practice guidelines based on expert opinion provide surveillance frequency guidelines for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density (BMD) scans after liver transplant (LT). Since then, post-transplant immunosuppression has changed. This study aims to use statistical models to identify the optimal DXA surveillance frequency after LT. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 402 LT recipients followed for up to 8 years post-LT, each with at least one pre-LT and two post-LT DXA scans. Linear mixed-effects (LME) models using random slopes and intercepts were used to identify whether BMD decline was linear or non-linear (quadratic) in time. Multivariate LME models were used to model the decline in femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and L1-L4 BMD decline after LT adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Results: Males had higher pre-LT BMD than females (P<0.001 at all sites). The rate of BMD loss was fastest at the FN, and faster in patients with normal pre-LT BMD than in patients with low pre-LT BMD (osteopenia/osteoporosis). The model predicted that there would be a significant FN BMD decrease in patients with normal pre-LT BMD after approximately 481 days post-LT (1 year, 3 months). Conclusion: LT recipients with normal pre-LT BMD should have DXA scans ~481 days post-LT. LT recipients with low BMD pre-LT who were more likely to be treated with bisphosphonates did not need annual DXA screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.