Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266864›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026

Flow Diverter Stents for Recurrent Intracranial Aneurysms after Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization: Safety, Efficacy, and Technical Considerations-A Comprehensive Review.

Makoto Sakamoto, Tetsuji Uno, Hiroki Yoshioka, Masamichi Kurosaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Makoto SakamotoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Tetsuji UnoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Hiroki YoshiokaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.
Masamichi KurosakiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization reduces intracranial aneurysm recurrence compared with coiling alone; however, post-SAC recanalization still occurs and presents a significant therapeutic challenge. This review evaluates SAC outcomes, predictors of recanalization, and the evidence for flow diverter stent (FDS) treatment of recurrent aneurysms following SAC. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE (January 2000-March 2026) with the terms "intracranial aneurysm," "stent-assisted coiling," "flow diverter," "recanalization," and "retreatment." Studies reporting quantitative angiographic or clinical outcomes were included. Case reports, non-English publications, and non-PubMed-indexed sources were excluded. Results: Coiling alone carries a recanalization rate of 20%-33% and retreatment rate of 10%-15%. SAC significantly reduces recurrence (recurrence risk 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.53), albeit with a higher procedural hemorrhagic risk. Bifurcation aneurysm location (odds ratio [OR] 9.02; p = 0.001) and convex parent artery curvature (OR 3.68; p = 0.025) were the dominant independent predictors of SAC recanalization; packing density alone was not independently significant. For post-SAC recurrent aneurysms, FDS achieves complete occlusion in 38%-94% across published series, with progressive improvement over time. The largest multicenter study (N = 118, 22 institutions) demonstrated a technical success rate of 98.3%, complete occlusion of 62.5%, combined complete-or-near-complete occlusion of 87.5%, major complication rate of 3.4%, and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) in 95.1%. Wider aneurysm neck diameter was the sole independent predictor of incomplete FDS occlusion (adjusted OR 1.23/mm; p = 0.044). Conclusion: Based on the available retrospective evidence, FDS treatment represents a technically feasible salvage option for post-SAC recurrent aneurysms with an acceptable complication profile in experienced centers; however, conclusions about superiority over alternative retreatment strategies and its role as the preferred modality are premature in the absence of prospective comparative data. Meticulous microwire navigation, appropriate FDS sizing, and rigorous dual antiplatelet therapy management may be essential for optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

flow diverter stentPipeline Embolization Devicerecurrent intracranial aneurysmretreatmentstent-assisted coiling

Identifiers

PMID42266864
PMCPMC13246277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.