ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
From evidence-based guidelines to practice: Using natural language processing to identify impactful interventions in falls prevention.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify and characterize implementation strategies for falls prevention in long-term care (LTC) homes using natural language processing (NLP) with a focus on the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario's (RNAO) Methods: A retrospective quality improvement study was conducted using narrative reports submitted to RNAO MyBPSO reporting system from 63 Ontario LTC homes (2017 to 2022). Free-text data describing implementation activities were analyzed using an NLP pipeline that included text preprocessing, tokenization, and keyword extraction using Rapid Automatic Keyword Extraction (RAKE). Extracted terms were aggregated into candidate themes and further analyzed using a lexicon-informed sentiment analysis approach adapted for clinical language. Themes were iteratively refined through a structured consensus process involving multidisciplinary experts. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Results: A total of 153 reports generated 235 preliminary themes, which were refined through sentiment analysis and expert consensus into 10 themes. Commonly identified strategies included falls risk assessment, fall prevention strategies, risk factors of falls, care plan development, post-fall assessments, falls tools, fall documentation, education and training, huddles, organizational policies, rounding, reflecting substantial uptake of key BPG recommendations. Sentiment analysis demonstrated predominantly neutral or positive sentiments across implementation narratives, with variability indicating differences in implementation experience. Gaps were most evident in documentation, i.e., post-fall follow-up actions and policy-level strategies, suggesting opportunities to strengthen implementation fidelity. Conclusions: The study identified a core set of frequently implemented falls prevention strategies in LTC settings. These findings provide actionable guidance for clinical practice by emphasizing the need to standardize risk screening and reassessment processes, strengthen post-fall evaluation and follow-up, improve documentation systems to support continuity of care, and implement ongoing, competency-based education for staff. Together, these targeted strategies can support more consistent translation of evidence-based guidelines into routine practice and enhance quality-improvement efforts in falls prevention in LTC settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.