ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
Promoting evidence-based nursing through collaboration, autonomy, and agency: A qualitative case study.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Patterns of change in evidence-based practice competence following a team-based learning intervention: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Evidence-Based Practice Attributes Among Specialist Nurses in Acute Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Implementing and evaluating a comprehensive simulation-based program to enhance nursing students' coping with death, burnout, and communication skills.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Nurses' Lived Experiences of Assessing Pain in Hospitalized Children in Indonesia: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Organisational contextual drivers of evidence-based practice across acute and primary care.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely accepted as central to high-quality nursing care, yet integration into acute care settings remains uneven. Nurses play a vital role in applying evidence, but organizational hierarchies, time constraints, and limited interprofessional collaboration often restrict their ability to lead or sustain EBP. This study explored how nurses enact, adapt, and promote EBP through interprofessional collaboration, everyday clinical leadership, and access to continuing professional development. Methods: An embedded comparative case study design was used, informed by interpretive and ethnographic principles. The research was conducted across two large hospitals in England with differing leadership and governance structures. Twenty-five participants were included, consisting of nurses, nurse managers, and physicians. Data were collected over six years through 25 semi-structured interviews, 60 h of non-participant observation, and review of policy and quality improvement documents. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Five key themes were identified: leadership practices and organizational support; professional identity and EBP ownership; interprofessional collaboration and communication; structural barriers and resource constraints; and capacity building through learning and feedback. Nurses enacted EBP through informal leadership, peer mentorship, and grassroots innovation. Structural barriers such as limited time, unequal access to continuing professional development, and fragmented collaboration significantly affected implementation. Conclusions: Nurses play an active and sustained role in leading EBP through their relationships, clinical judgment, and commitment to care quality. However, their efforts are shaped by the broader organizational systems in which they work. Supporting interprofessional collaboration, distributed leadership, establishing EBP mentoring roles, and ensuring equitable access to continuing professional development are essential for consistent and inclusive evidence use. Hospital managers and policymakers should prioritize structural investment in team-based learning, inclusive governance and digital access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.