ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
Development and implementation of an ecological education model for evidence-based practice competency in undergraduate nursing students: A mixed-methods feasibility study.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a competency-oriented ecological education model and evaluate the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of its implementation for enhancing evidence-based practice competencies among undergraduate nursing students. Methods: An ecological education model was developed based on educational ecology theory and the input-environment-output (IEO) theoretical framework, and implemented from 2019 to 2024. The model integrated three core components: a four-year progressive competency development pathway (ranging from evidence-based thinking in year one to comprehensive practice application in year four); a three-tier ecological environment (comprising physical, classroom, and practice environments that incorporates six best practice spotlight organization guidelines into eight core courses); and multidimensional practice platforms, including health science communication and guideline translation. The reform was conducted at a nursing school of a double first-class university in Beijing, China. A naturalistic longitudinal cohort design was employed, which included 1,223 undergraduate nursing students at baseline (2019, pre-reform) and 1,237 at post-implementation (2024). A convergent parallel mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the implementation outcomes. Quantitative data on academic performance and innovation outcomes were collected at both time points, baseline and post-implementation. Semi-structured interviews with 18 students were conducted to supplement the exploration of their learning experiences. Results: Academic engagement increased from 78.5 % to 97.3 %, evidence-based graduation theses rose from 18.6 % to 30.0 %, and innovation and entrepreneurship projects increased from 40 to 150. Qualitative analysis revealed four themes and twelve subthemes, revealing enhanced critical appraisal skills (88.9 %), evidence synthesis capabilities (94.4 %), and professional confidence (83.3 %) among students. Integrated mixed-methods analysis revealed stage-specific characteristics across academic years: a complementarity pattern in Year 1 (foundational awareness building), a convergence pattern in Years 2-3 (systematic competency construction), an expansion pattern during the Year 3 transition (role adaptation challenges), and a convergence pattern in Year 4 (comprehensive transformation and professional confidence enhancement). Conclusions: This feasibility study demonstrated that the ecological education model could be successfully implemented in undergraduate nursing education with promising preliminary outcomes. This study provides an initial framework for nursing education innovation and establishes foundational evidence warranting future rigorous controlled studies to examine the model's effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.