ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Machine-learning classification of bipolar disorder incorporating wearable-derived core body temperature and actigraphy-derived sleep indices.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to classify patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and normal controls (NCs) using machine-learning models that incorporate wearable-derived core body temperature (CBT) and actigraphy-derived sleep indices. Methods: We enrolled 23 euthymic patients with BD and 43 NCs. Sleep parameters were collected via wrist actigraphy for 14 days, and CBT was measured with a wearable device for 3 days to estimate the CBT nadir and its phase differences with sleep indices. Models were constructed with a base model using CBT- and sleep-derived features, and an extended model that included sociodemographic variables. Features were standardized (StandardScaler), and classifiers (random forest, LightGBM, and XGBoost) were evaluated. Hyperparameters were optimized using cross-validation within the training data. Performance was evaluated using repeated nested cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were computed in the extended model to quantify relative feature contributions to the model output. Results: In nested cross-validation at the MaxF1 operating point, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.771 ± 0.162 for the base model and 0.930 ± 0.050 for the extended model. In the extended model, SHAP suggested that total sleep time, wake time, and the wake time-CBT nadir phase difference were features potentially associated with the model output. Conclusion: In this small-sample study, a classification approach combining wearable-derived CBT indices and actigraphy-based sleep parameters suggested preliminary discrimination between BD and NC. Further validation is warranted in larger cohorts with balanced background characteristics, including disorders requiring differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.