ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Screening anxiety via contrastive autobiographical recall.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Language offers a low-burden and scalable pathway for digital anxiety screening, particularly in telehealth or repeated-monitoring settings where spontaneous speech may already be available. This study introduces a contrastive autobiographical recall framework that uses short positive and negative personal memories to capture within person affective shifts in language. By modelling how the same individual expresses emotionally distinct experiences, the proposed approach aims to identify anxiety-related linguistic patterns that may not be captured from a single static text representation. Methods: A total of 156 participants completed a 5-7 minute spontaneous speech task involving positive and negative autobiographical memories. Anxiety status was defined using HAM-A scores, yielding non-anxious ( Results: The proposed pipeline achieved 70% accuracy and 0.67 macro-F1 across leaveone-out folds, with stronger performance for non-anxious participants than anxious participants. Bootstrap confidence intervals were 0.62-0.77 for accuracy and 0.59-0.75 for macro-F1. Ablation analysis showed that the full composite representation provided the best balanced performance and strongest anxious-class detection. The method also outperformed BERT-based and lexicon-based baseline models. Discussion: These findings suggest that short autobiographical speech can provide a useful complementary signal for digital anxiety screening when modelled with contextual embeddings and within-person affective contrast. Latent-space augmentation supported learning in this small cohort without altering participant-authored language. However, anxious-class sensitivity was moderate, and HAM-A labels should be interpreted as screening rather than diagnostic labels. Further validation in larger and more diverse clinical cohorts is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.