ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Digital first primary care in NHS England: evaluating alignment with patient-centered care and implications for future practice.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Digital First Primary Care (DFPC) model, introduced by NHS England, aims to enhance healthcare accessibility and efficiency by leveraging digital tools such as telemedicine, digital triage, and virtual consultations. In this structured narrative review, we synthesized UK-focused empirical, policy, and implementation literature to examine DFPC through the patient-centered care (PCC) domains of access, autonomy, shared decision-making, continuity, relational quality, and equity. The available evidence suggests that DFPC can improve convenience, flexibility, and timeliness of first contact for some patients, but these gains are unevenly distributed and depend heavily on system design, workflow integration, and patient capability. Evidence generated during the COVID-19 emergency should not be conflated with the evaluation of routine, policy-driven post-pandemic DFPC, because the goals, constraints, and patient expectations differ across these contexts. We therefore argue that DFPC aligns with PCC only when implemented within a flexible hybrid model that preserves modality choice, supports continuity, provides safe escalation to in-person care, and actively mitigates digital exclusion. Future research should prioritize patient-reported experience, continuity, safety, and equity outcomes under routine post-pandemic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.