Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266811›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Facial Asymmetry as a Universal Signature: A Morphometric, Perceptual, and Artistic Approach.

Marc Divaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marc DivarisFrom the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Pitié Salpêtrière University, Paris, I>le-de-France, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Facial asymmetry is universal, yet its directionality and its relationship with patients' self-perception remain underexplored. This study evaluates the association between 3-dimensional-measured malar asymmetry and the patient's declared "better side" in an aesthetic population. Methods: One hundred twenty consecutive patients were photographed in standardized frontal view using the Vectra H2 system. Malar width was assessed by measuring the zygion-midline distance on each side, recorded twice and averaged. Patients completed a 10-item ad hoc questionnaire addressing their preferred side, perceived asymmetries, photographic habits, and mirror-photograph differences. Observed frequencies were compared to a theoretical 50/50 distribution using chi-square testing. Results: Objective asymmetry was present in 98.3% of subjects, with a wider left side in 118 cases ( Conclusions: Although a left-sided directional asymmetry predominates, it does not align with patients' stated preferences or their subjective self-image. Recognizing this dissociation between structure and perception during consultation improves expectation management and reduces postoperative misunderstandings in facial aesthetic procedures.

Identifiers

PMID42266811
PMCPMC13246018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.