ReviewJMA journal2026
A Scoping Review of Camp Activities for Children with Developmental Disorders.
Review in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing number of children diagnosed with developmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and learning disabilities, poses increasing challenges for social inclusion and support systems. Among various support interventions, nature-based camp activities have attracted attention for their potential to provide multifaceted benefits. This review aimed to clarify the value and effects of camp activities for children with developmental disorders, their families, and staff, based on contemporary perspectives that reflect changing views on disability and human-nature relationships. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, literature searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Ichushi-Web, CiNii, and J-Stage, without restrictions on study design or publication year. Eligible studies described camp activities for children (0-18 years) with developmental disorders in natural environments and were published in English or Japanese. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data extraction covered study characteristics, participant profiles, and reported outcomes, which were synthesized narratively. Results: Eighteen studies (15 Japanese, 3 English) met the criteria. Reported benefits included reduced anxiety, enhanced self-confidence, self-efficacy, social skills, and an increased sense of belonging. Parents experienced respite and improved family functioning. Staff and volunteers reported personal growth and a deeper understanding of disability. Natural environments were described as providing sensory stimulation, adventurous experiences, and temporary release from daily constraints, aligning with the social model of disability. Conclusions: This scoping review revealed that camp activities in natural settings hold promise as a unique integrative approach that bridges social and ecological perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.