ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Tuned to language: the influence of musicality on phonaesthetic judgments.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aesthetic perception is a cross-modal phenomenon that integrates sensory, emotional, and cognitive processes. While traditionally focused on visual arts and music, recent research has extended this framework to phonaesthetics, which explores affective judgments of language sounds. This study investigates the intersection of musicality and phonaesthetic judgments, particularly focusing on the dimension of eros (eroticity) in language perception. Musicality, encompassing sensitivity to pitch, rhythm, and timbre, has been linked to language aptitude, prosodic sensitivity, and emotional processing in speech. However, its role in shaping affective-aesthetic evaluations of language remains underexplored. Methods: The study involved 203 participants, who were asked to give affective-aesthetic judgements of 24 languages (48 recordings). Musicality was assessed through self-reported general aptitude, singing skills, and instrumental skills. Familiarity with the languages was controlled to isolate the effects of musicality. Results: Results revealed that general musicality showed a trend in predicting eros ratings, but singing skills emerged as a significant predictor. Participants with higher singing abilities rated languages as more erotic, suggesting a shared vocal and prosodic foundation between singing and speech. Instrumental skills, in contrast, did not significantly influence eros ratings. Interestingly, the effect of singing skills on eros ratings was higher than the effect of familiarity, which was assumed to play a bigger role due to the mere-exposure effect. Discussion: The findings highlight the nuanced role of musicality in language perception, with singing skills offering a unique lens into the affective-aesthetic resonance of speech. This supports the notion of a vocal aptitude that bridges music and language, aligning with theories of a musilinguistic continuum. Additionally, the study suggests that singers may possess refined auditory and proprioceptive awareness, enabling more nuanced evaluations of unfamiliar languages. The results also raise questions about the influence of "exoticity", as the sample consisted of rarer languages. This research contributes to interdisciplinary discussions on the interplay between music, language, and aesthetics, emphasizing the need for further exploration of sub-dimensions of musicality, or creativity in general. By bridging linguistics, musicology, and aesthetic psychology, the study opens new avenues for understanding how musicality shapes the emotional processing of language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.