Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The relationship between peer victimization and depression: a moderated mediation model of self-esteem and resilience.

Pingyan Zhou, Jiani Peng, Cai Zhang, Zhe Wang, Jian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pingyan ZhouSchool of Psychology, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Jiani PengSchool of Psychology, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.
Cai ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Zhe WangCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Jian LiuCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although peer victimization is a known risk factor for depression, the specific mediating and moderating processes need further study. Methods: This research used self-report data from 58,753 fourth graders to measure peer victimization, selfesteem, resilience, and depression. Results: The analysis showed that peer victimization was associated with depression both directly (71.92%) and indirectly (28.08%). The relationship between peer victimization and depression was partially mediated by self-esteem. Resilience exhibited a protective-enhancing effect in the relationship between peer victimization and depression: its role strengthened as peer victimization worsens. Whereas, resilience demonstrated protective-reactive effect of both peer victimization on self-esteem and self-esteem on depression, its protective effect attenuated when high victimization coincided with very low self-esteem. Clarified that protective-enhancing applies only to the direct path, while protective-reactive applies to the two indirect paths. Conclusion: Although peer victimization is a crucial predictor of depression, effective interventions for depression must extend beyond fostering supportive peer environments by also targeting key internal processes-specifically, by building resilience and disrupting the internalization of victimization into negative self-esteem.

Indexed as

depressionmoderated mediation modelpeer victimizationresilienceself-esteem

Identifiers

PMID42266766
PMCPMC13243248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.