ArticleGlobal health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Knowledge acquisition and retention when implementing public health awareness training on common pediatric eye conditions in Thailand.
Article in Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prioritizing Pediatric Eye Care in Saudi Arabia: A National Delphi Consensus Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Low awareness of common pediatric eye conditions, such as amblyopia, conjunctivitis, and myopia in rural Chiang Rai, Thailand, prompted the development of a specialized curriculum. This curriculum aimed to provide individuals serving these areas with resources to educate and disseminate information within their communities. Methods: A one-hour curriculum covering the causes, signs, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of amblyopia, conjunctivitis, and myopia was delivered virtually to public health students at a Thai university and in-person to students at this university and rural community members. The in-person seminar included hands-on activities and simulations of these eye conditions. Knowledge acquisition and retention were assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and one-month post-tests. Results: The seminar was attended by 87 virtual public health students, 111 in-person public health students, and 40 in-person rural community members. All groups showed significant improvement in test scores from pre-test to immediate post-test ( Conclusion: A brief seminar significantly improved understanding and retention of pediatric eye conditions, achieving similar levels of understanding among public health students and rural community members, regardless of initial knowledge on this topic. In-person, hands-on seminars with educational materials in participants' preferred language proved more effective than virtual ones in achieving these improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.