Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266711›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2026

Surveillance of Pharmaceutical Risk-Mitigation Behavior: Applying and Comparing Statistical Process Control Methods Using Real World Data.

Harris Butler, John D Rice, Nichole E Carlson, Elaine H Morrato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harris ButlerDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-4957
John D RiceDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA.
Nichole E CarlsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-6663
Elaine H MorratoParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health Loyola University Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6105-7826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Active post-marketing surveillance of prescribing behavior of high-risk drugs may provide early warning of unforeseen issues in a population, yet analysis approaches for surveillance using real-world data are underdeveloped. This paper evaluates a modified statistical process control (SPC) method for surveillance of risk minimization measures derived from administrative claims data. The approach detects changes in population-level prescribing behaviors and informs investigators of the timing and nature of any detected changes. Methods: We investigated prescription drug claims for tapentadol extended release (ER) from the Colorado All-Payers Claims Database (2012-2019). The cohort was 2702 unique patients receiving their first prescriptions of tapentadol ER (an opiate with an FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy). The risk minimization measures were the prescribing rate and the proportion of prescriptions with appropriate dosing. A statistical model was fitted to data from January-December 2012 to establish a stable baseline and then updated biweekly through June 2019. We conducted surveillance with our modified SPC method and a classical SPC method, controlling the false alarm rate to 0.005 for each, and compared how detections aligned with external policy actions. Results: Our method detected two periods of unusual prescribing behavior beginning in March 2015 ( Conclusion: Our modified SPC method, which monitors model misspecification rather than raw prescribing data, detects more periods of changing behavior that better temporally align with risk minimization actions. This tool may be useful for regulatory agencies to independently monitor for emerging risks and prescribing trends to complement REMS assessments.

Indexed as

administrative claims dataFDAmisspecificationpharmacovigilancereal‐world dataREMSrisk mitigationstatistical process controlsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42266711
PMCPMC13242977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.