Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266699›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Immunotherapy plus induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy alone or one cycle of concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin vs induction chemotherapy followed by two cycles of concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Renba Liang, Xinxiao Li, Manyi Zhu, Fengming Lan, Fangmeng Fu, Ling Lei, Teng Zou, Li Ma, Peng Chen, Lingzhi Luo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Renba Liang *Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Xinxiao Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Manyi ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Fengming LanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Fangmeng FuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Ling LeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Teng ZouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Li MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Peng ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Lingzhi LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Jing JinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Jianghu ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy alone or one cycle of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus induction chemotherapy followed by two cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: A total of 173 patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated at our hospital from November 2019 to September 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received induction therapy with immunotherapy (toripalimab or tislelizumab) combined with chemotherapy (TPC or GP) followed by radiotherapy alone or one cycle of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (immunochemotherapy group). Patients received TPC or GP induction chemotherapy followed by 2 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (IC-CCRT group). Immunotherapy was given on day 1 of each cycle of induction therapy. The efficacy and toxicities of the two groups were evaluated. Results: After induction therapy, 20 patients (29.4%) in the immunochemotherapy group and 15 patients (14.3%) in the IC-CCRT group achieved complete remission (p=0.02). At a median follow-up of 27.5 months, recurrence or metastasis occurred in 7.4%(5/68) of the patients in the immunochemotherapy group and 19.0%(20/105) of those in the IC-CCRT group. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the immunochemotherapy group were 93.5% vs 81.1% (p=0.03), 100.0% vs 97.9% (p=0.3), 96.9% vs 91.4% (p=0.2), 95.0% vs 88.2% (p=0.1) compared with the IC-CCRT group. There were 28 cases (41.1%) in the immunochemotherapy group and 58 cases (55.2%) in the IC-CCRT group experienced grade 3-4 acute adverse events. In the immunochemotherapy group, 4 patients developed grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events. Conclusions: Compared with induction chemotherapy followed by two cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, immunotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy alone or one cycle of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin may improve the EFS of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with low adverse events. However, this data requires prospective randomized controlled studies to be confirmed in the future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyCisplatinImmunotherapyInduction ChemotherapyNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCisplatincisplatinconcurrent chemoradiotherapyimmunotherapyinduction therapynasopharyngeal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42266699
PMCPMC13243257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.