ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Screening of biomarkers and machine learning prediction in traumatic brain injury.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Accessible blood and hormonal biomarkers may be related to injury severity and cognitive status in patients undergoing neurorehabilitation. This study used explainable machine learning to explore the associations of routine blood parameters and hormones with radiological injury severity and cognitive status in TBI. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional multicenter study, 154 patients with TBI were enrolled. Blood samples were collected within 1 week after admission to assess routine hematological indices, liver and renal function, blood lipids, and hormone levels. Injury severity was evaluated using the Helsinki CT Score, and cognitive status was assessed using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). After preprocessing, data were split into training and validation sets at a ratio of 7:3. LASSO regression was used for feature selection, and six machine learning models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using Results: LASSO identified eight features for the Helsinki CT Score and four for MMSE. Random forest performed best for the Helsinki CT Score (validation Conclusion: Routine blood and hormonal biomarkers, particularly IGF-1, may be associated with radiological injury severity and cognitive status in TBI. These findings are exploratory and require validation in larger longitudinal studies. Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300072902. Medical Research Registration Number: MR-11-23-023826.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.