SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Acupuncture therapy for post-stroke spasticity: a systematic review and exploratory network meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and dose-response relationship.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Acupuncture has shown good therapeutic potential in post-stroke spasticity (PSS). We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and optimal acupuncture type and dose of acupuncture for PSS. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 8 databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Databases (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature database (Sinomed), and Wan Fang database) to search randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for PSS from their inception to December 1, 2025. Data analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted using StataMP 18 software. The risk of bias was evaluated using RevMan 5.3 software. Adverse events (AEs) related to acupuncture were collected to assess the safety of acupuncture therapy. The optimal type and dose of acupuncture for anti-spasticity effects were evaluated by using the acupuncture dose-effect relationship evaluation model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) were employed to assess evidence reliability and certainty. Results: This meta-analysis included 34 trials and 3,383 PSS patients, with manual acupuncture (MA), warm acupuncture (WA), scalp acupuncture (SA), fire acupuncture (FA), and electro-acupuncture (EA). The findings showed that acupuncture significantly improved the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [FMA-U: MD = 0.87, 95% CI (0.68, 1.07), Conclusion: Acupuncture can improve the spasticity, motor function and activities of daily living of stroke patients; WA and high-dose showed the highest probability of being optimal intervention for spasticity; however, the certainty of evidence remains limited. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025633455, identifier (CRD42025633455).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.