ArticleInternational journal of mental health and addiction2022
Implementation of Integrated Dual Disorder Treatment in Routine Veterans Health Administration Settings.
Article in International journal of mental health and addiction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frontline staff experiences of bridging dual diagnosis treatments - Determinants for implementing a cross-sectoral collaboration model.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2026Article
- 'Amazing and Daunting': Providers' Perspectives on the Implementation of Neurofeedback.Research square · 2026Article
- Setting Factors Associated With Licensed Psychotherapists' Interest in the Implementation of Electroencephalogram Neurofeedback Into Practice.Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Dual diagnosis and their care pathways for help-seeking: A multicenter study from India.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrated dual disorder treatment is an evidence-based practice for coordinating complex care for people with severe mental illnesses and comorbid substance use disorders in a single program. Despite its effectiveness, the program can be difficult to implement and is not routinely implemented in Veterans Health Administration settings. This study sought to better understand factors in implementation of this model using. We evaluated the model in four different programs at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers and documented costs associated with implementation efforts at one site. We used interviews and observations to characterize factors (with initial coding based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) impacting implementation. Critical factors included the perceived usefulness of the model for patients served by the program, the need for ongoing case-based coaching after initial training, staff openness to stage-wise approaches as opposed to abstinence-only interventions, leadership at both the team and upper-level manager levels, and the need for model adaptation within varied program settings. Costs for implementation were relatively modest for both programs observed. These results should inform future efforts to implement the model in the Veterans Health Administration and are also relevant to implementation challenges in other mental health service settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.