ArticleCureus2026
Uterine Perforation With Extrauterine Intrauterine Device (IUD) Migration Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used long-acting reversible contraceptives with a favorable safety profile. However, uterine perforation is a rare complication that may result in extrauterine migration of the IUD and may also involve adjacent pelvic or abdominal structures, and is often an incidental finding during imaging performed for unrelated indications. We present the case of a 32-year-old female with a copper IUD placed approximately seven years prior without gynecologic follow-up who presented to the emergency department following a motor vehicle collision with abdominal pain. The patient was hemodynamically stable. Abdominal examination demonstrated diffuse tenderness to palpation with involuntary guarding. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated uterine fundal perforation with extrauterine migration of the IUD abutting and possibly penetrating the distal sigmoid colon without other imaging findings. Repeat imaging at a tertiary trauma center confirmed stable extrauterine IUD positioning without evidence of interval change. Given clinical stability and absence of overt visceral perforation, multidisciplinary evaluation favored conservative inpatient observation with close outpatient follow-up for definitive removal. The absence of prior gynecologic symptoms supports blunt trauma as the precipitating mechanism of uterine perforation. Perforated IUDs do not always cause pneumoperitoneum or hemoperitoneum. Clinicians evaluating patients with indwelling IUDs after blunt pelvic trauma should maintain a high index of suspicion for acute perforation and ensure systematic assessment of device position on cross-sectional imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.