ArticleJournal of oral & maxillofacial research
Prevalence and Anatomical Variations of the
Article in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the prevalence of the Material and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans including the full maxillary arch of adult patients was performed. The Results: Among 200 CBCT scans, CS was identified in 73% of subjects (365 canals), with bilateral presentation in 63% and predominantly palatal openings (96.7%). Most canals measured < 1 mm (88.7%) and median CS diameter was significantly greater on the right than on the left (0.78 [SD] vs. 0.7 [SD] mm; P = 0.034). Males exhibited significantly larger CS diameters and greater CS-nasal cavity floor and CS-buccal cortical bone distances bilaterally (P < 0.05). CS was most frequently located in the central and lateral incisor regions. No significant association was observed between CS location and sex or between age groups and CS dimensions or location; however, unilateral occurrence was more frequent in the age group of 18 to 30 years (P = 0.002). Conclusions: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.