ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Species Distribution Models and Abundance Estimates Enhance Breeding Bird Atlas Data.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breeding bird atlases play a crucial role in understanding bird species distribution and abundance during the breeding season. This information is essential for creating accurate species distribution maps, which are fundamental for understanding the geographic range of species and identifying areas of high conservation value. Our primary goal was to develop species distribution models (SDMs) for as many Minnesota breeding bird species as possible using data from the Minnesota Breeding Bird Atlas (MNBBA; 2009-2013). The MNBBA combined volunteer atlas observations with systematic point-count surveys, resulting in datasets that varied in structure and quality across species. Recognizing this variability, we applied multiple modeling approaches tailored to the available data, which also led to differing ecological interpretations. To maximize species coverage given heterogeneous data characteristics, we used three modeling strategies to maximize the number of species we modeled: (1) bootstrapped Poisson generalized linear models with a detectability offset to predict species' density and population size, (2) bootstrapped Poisson generalized linear models to predict a species' point count index of abundance, and (3) Maxent models to predict a species' index of environmental suitability. We applied the first strategy to 73 species, the second to 30, and the third to 33 species each (136 species in total). We also produced statewide population estimates for the 73 species using the first strategy. Our framework demonstrates that linking model choice to data structure significantly increases the number of species that can be modeled compared to a single-model approach. While these results serve as a foundation for broad-scale distribution and abundance hypotheses, we suggest this adaptable methodology be tested in other regions to maximize the utility of diverse atlas datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.