ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
Navigating Uncharted Waters: A Meta-Ethnography Exploring General Practitioners and Women's Experience of Perimenopause Consultations in General Practice.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perimenopause precedes menopause and can cause a wide range of symptoms for women. General Practitioners (GPs) are often the first point of contact for symptom management. Shifting societal attitudes to perimenopause have prompted more women to seek care within general practice, yet many report suboptimal support. Despite the increasing body of research on menopause care, the experiences of perimenopause consultations in general practice have yet to be conceptually synthesised. This qualitative evidence synthesis, therefore, aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of women and General Practitioners regarding perimenopause consultations in general practice. Methods: We followed the methods of meta-ethnography as developed by Noblit and Hare and our reporting follows the eMERGE reporting guidance. Seven databases were systematically searched to identify studies detailing the experiences of women and GPs during perimenopause consultations. To evaluate confidence in the review findings, we employed the GRADE-CERQual approach. Results: Ten studies were included in the synthesis. Conclusion: This qualitative evidence synthesis highlights the tensions and challenges encountered by women and GPs as they navigate the uncertainties inherent in perimenopause care. The results underscore the importance of sensitive and empathetic communication, where normalisation is delivered with compassion, and uncertainty is acknowledged and conveyed transparently. Openly recognising these uncertainties helps manage expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.