Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266459›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

The anaerobic digestion microbiome is robust toward variation in the waste activated sludge feed.

Josefien Van Landuyt, Jasmine Oosterlinck, Jo De Vrieze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josefien Van LanduytCentre for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Universiteit Gent, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, Gent B-9052, Belgium.
Jasmine OosterlinckCentre for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Universiteit Gent, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, Gent B-9052, Belgium.
Jo De VriezeCentre for Microbial Ecology and Technology, Universiteit Gent, Frieda Saeysstraat 1, Gent B-9052, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion stands out as the foremost technology for maximizing the valorization of waste activated sludge (WAS) to recover energy and recover resources. The physical/chemical and microbial makeup of WAS is susceptible to seasonal fluctuations, due to the open-air nature of wastewater treatment facilities, potentially impacting subsequent digester performance and the quality of the resulting digestate. This study delved into a comprehensive analysis of both the initial WAS and the digestate produced by 12 full-scale digesters during both a summer and winter sampling campaign. A significant influence of seasonal variations was observed on the physical/chemical and microbial composition of WAS. Interestingly, the digestate microbiome exhibited a high resilience with minimal seasonal fluctuations, but instead showed variations between different digesters. In summary, this research demonstrates that while WAS composition manifests in specific physical/chemical attributes, it does not exert a discernible influence on the microbial composition of the resulting digestate.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene sequencinganaerobic digestate qualitycommunity analysisecological microbiologymicrobial community compositionseasonal fluctuations

Identifiers

PMID42266459
PMCPMC13245180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.