ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2026
Impact of reconstruction kernel variability on segmentation consistency in low-dose thoracic CT.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural thoracic segmentation with computed tomography (CT) has become a ubiquitous step in medical image processing. Several tools-including TotalSegmentator-now provide efficient, open methods for labeling regions of interest (ROI) in CT. However, variability in CT reconstruction kernels, especially between soft and hard kernels, can affect image characteristics and potentially impact automatic segmentation, downstream analysis, and clinical decisions. Yet, this variability and its impact on downstream analysis have not been fully investigated in a systematic way. To address this, we examine the consistency of thoracic region segmentations produced by TotalSegmentator when applied to 9,529 CT images reconstructed with paired soft and hard kernels from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) dataset. It includes 9,529 CT scan pairs from 9,519 subjects (5,733 men, 3,796 women; ages 43-74), with each subject contributing one scan session, including data from multiple vendors (Siemens, Philips and GE Medical Systems) and reconstruction kernels, drawn from the Lung Screening Study (LSS) (n=6,794), American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) with biomarkers (n=1,488), and ACRIN without biomarkers (n=1,247), with 10 duplicated subjects treated as separate individuals. We quantified kernel-induced variability using Dice similarity coefficient, volumetric and intensity differences across 84 thoracic regions. We evaluated the relationship between the average and difference of volumes, Hounsfield Units (HU) and standard deviation of HU of ROI. Additionally, we assessed manufacturer-specific differences in segmentation consistency between Philips, Siemens and GE Medical Systems. Graphical representations with Bland-Altman plots show that some thoracic regions (e.g. heart) are more robust to kernel variation than others (e.g. thyroid gland), and Siemens scanners show the lowest segmentation variability between kernel types. These findings provide early insights into when kernel-induced variability affects automatic segmentation performance differently across the body in clinical and research workflows, therefore emphasizing the need for consistent CT reconstruction or kernel harmonization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.