ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
Beyond 20/20: How Laser Eye Surgery Boosts Quality of Life (SMILE vs. FS-LASIK).
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond 20/20: How Laser Eye Surgery Boosts Quality of Life (SMILE vs. FS-LASIK).Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Uncorrected refractive errors are the main cause of visual impairment globally and can be corrected with refractive surgeries, such as femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). The success rate of the procedure is determined by its efficacy, stability, predictability, and safety. Although these parameters are important, they should be accompanied by the patient's subjective report to assess the success of the surgery. Research has shown that SMILE patients have a better quality of life owing to lower rates of postoperative symptoms and dry eyes. This study aimed to compare improvement in patient quality of life after the SMILE and FS-LASIK procedures. Methods: This was an analytical observational study with a prospective design conducted at the PMN Cicendo Eye Hospital. Fifty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria: 33 and 24 patients underwent the FS-LASIK and SMILE procedures, respectively. Samples were collected using a purposive method at a LASIK center. Patients were asked to complete the NEI-RQL 42 questionnaire, and an IDRA ocular surface analyzer examination was carried out at the Aesthetic and Dry Eye Clinic. Results: Patient characteristics were dominated by male sex, secondary education levels, and students. Significant differences in characteristics were found with greater refractive error in the FS-LASIK group. A comparison of questionnaire score improvements revealed higher scores in the SMILE group, especially in terms of symptoms and average questionnaire scores. Conclusion: There was a better improvement in quality of life in patients after the SMILE procedure than after the FS-LASIK procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.