SynthesisFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
The role of virtual reality in balance training for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The use of virtual reality (VR) as a therapeutic modality to improve balance in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is promising due to its interactive simulations. However, the advantage of VR over conventional balance training has yet to be established. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates and summarizes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VR interventions to conventional physiotherapy. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EBSCOHost, and SciELO databases was performed. Article selection and filtering were performed using Rayyan software. Results: The search yielded 185 research articles, of which 162 remained after removing duplicates. Screening the titles and abstracts for the use of VR and reviewing the full-texts for the RCT design yielded 17 articles, six of which used the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The data from these remaining six trials were included in this systematic review. Data extraction resulted in 214 participants (105 controls and 109 in the VR intervention). The average age of the participants was 61.43 ± 13.3 years, with 74 (34.6%) women and a mean PD duration of 7.11 ± 1.91 years. The average number of sessions was 25 (10-60), with an average follow-up period of 3.5 months. At follow-up, the control group improved by an average of 1.64 ± 1.84 points on the BBS, whereas the VR group improved by an average of 2.85 ± 1.74 points. There was no significant difference ( Conclusions: VR-based interventions for patients with PD are as effective as conventional physiotherapy for improving balance in short-term follow-ups. VR-based interventions alongside conventional physiotherapy may deliver efficient and tailor-made balance training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.