ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Knowledge and use of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a cross-sectional survey among health professionals in Pakistan.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), provides a standardized framework for understanding and measuring health and disability. While widely adopted globally, its implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as Pakistan, remains inconsistent and underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practical application of the ICF among healthcare professionals in Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted using the Kobo Toolbox platform and distributed via social media to a diverse group of healthcare professionals. The survey comprised closed-ended questions across three domains: (I) demographics, education, and professional experience; (II) knowledge and utilisation of the ICF in clinical practice; and (III) clinical practice settings. A filtering question determined whether respondents claimed familiarity with the ICF. Actual knowledge was further evaluated through a four-item multiple-choice instrument; respondents answering at least two questions correctly were operationally classified as having moderate to good knowledge. Results: Of the 52 respondents, 63.5% held a medical degree-including two (6.1%) with training in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine-while 36.5% were non-medical healthcare professionals (including nurses and medical students). While 48% claimed familiarity with the ICF, only 17% demonstrated actual moderate to good knowledge upon evaluation. ICF literacy was more prevalent among those holding doctoral degrees or at least 16 years of professional experience. Conclusion: These findings reveal an apparent gap between perceived and actual ICF knowledge among health professionals in Pakistan. The integration of ICF content into medical curricula, professional training, and continuing medical education (CME) is recommended to enhance disability assessment and rehabilitation planning in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.