ArticleCureus2026
Minimally Invasive Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization Using an Adjustable Endobutton: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acromioclavicular joint dislocations (ACJD) are frequent shoulder injuries in young, active patients and athletes and can lead to pain, functional impairment, and cosmetic deformity if not adequately treated. Surgical management of high‑grade ACJD remains controversial, with numerous techniques described and no clear gold standard, particularly regarding the balance between stability, invasiveness, and the need for hardware removal. This study of two cases (Rockwood types III and IV) evaluated a novel minimally invasive technique using an adjustable Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, London, UK) with a single clavicular tunnel via a mini-open deltopectoral approach. At the six‑ and 12‑month follow‑up, both patients showed excellent anatomic reduction maintained over time, no loss of reduction or major complications, and near‑complete functional recovery as assessed by the Oxford Shoulder Score. The technique restores vertical stability, limits surgical morbidity, avoids secondary hardware removal, and adheres to anatomic principles by recreating coracoclavicular ligament function. While these results are encouraging, the small sample size and retrospective design limit the generalizability of the findings, and larger prospective comparative studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.