ArticleCureus2026
Role of Repeat Preoperative Endoscopy in Colorectal Cancer: Patients' Perspectives.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRepeat preoperative endoscopy is a common practice in colorectal cancer care; however, it is often viewed as inefficient, potentially avoidable, and incurring costs or delays. While provider and system perspectives have been examined, this study aimed to explore patients' experiences and perspectives regarding repeat preoperative colonoscopy to understand its perceived value within the cancer care pathway.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews at a tertiary academic center. Twenty adult patients treated for colorectal cancer (2019-2025) who underwent repeat preoperative endoscopy were recruited to explore their perspectives. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis rooted in grounded theory.
resultsDespite the procedural burden, 80% of participants reported a positive overall experience, and 75% perceived a clear benefit from the repeat procedure. Three major themes emerged: (1) Trust and Verification, where patients valued relationship-building with the surgeon and the reassuring "second look" for surgical accuracy and planning; (2) Part of the Patient Journey, where the procedure was accepted and normalized as a manageable step despite the burden of bowel preparation; and (3) Communication and Coordination, where participants highlighted gaps in care plan comprehension and logistical navigation.
conclusionsPatients largely accepted repeat preoperative endoscopy as a justified and reassuring component of their care, fostering trust in the surgical plan, rather than perceiving it as a redundant or burdensome delay in their treatment. This counter-narrative to traditional provider-focused metrics suggests that while system efficiency remains important, repeat endoscopy provides a unique opportunity for enhancing the patient-provider therapeutic alliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.