Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266296›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Reassessment of Long-Term Guideline-Directed Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease in Primary Care.

Joomong Park

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joomong ParkMedicine, Sacheon City Public Health Center, Sacheon, KOR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease is a manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events, limb complications, and mortality. Guideline-directed medical therapy, including antiplatelet agents and statins, is recommended for secondary prevention, whereas cilostazol and exercise therapy are primarily intended for symptomatic relief of claudication. We report the case of a 68-year-old man with previously diagnosed peripheral arterial occlusive disease who presented to a primary care clinic with worsening intermittent claudication while receiving cilostazol without documented antiplatelet or statin therapy. His comorbidities included hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus with complications, chronic kidney disease, prior ischemic stroke, and former tobacco use. Physical examination revealed diminished pulses in the affected limb and a relatively cool foot without ulceration or acute infection. Laboratory evaluation showed serum creatinine 1.44 mg/dL (reference range: 0.70-1.30 mg/dL), estimated glomerular filtration rate 49 mL/min/1.73 m² (reference range: ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and glycated hemoglobin 5.7% (reference range: 4.0%-5.6%). Aspirin 100 mg daily and rosuvastatin 10 mg daily were initiated for cardiovascular risk reduction. Cilostazol was later resumed for symptomatic management, and aspirin was changed to clopidogrel because of gastrointestinal intolerance. At the fourth week follow-up, the patient reported a modest increase in walking distance, although causality could not be established. This case highlights the importance of periodic medication reconciliation, reassessment of long-term vascular risk management, and recognition that symptomatic therapy should not substitute for guideline-directed secondary prevention in patients with established peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Indexed as

antiplatelet therapyintermittent claudicationperipheral arterial diseaseprimary caresecondary preventionstatin

Identifiers

PMID42266296
PMCPMC13245633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.