ArticlePaediatrics & child health2026
Complications of tympanostomy tubes in patients with cleft palate.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of complications after tympanostomy tube insertion among patients with a cleft palate. The secondary objective was to assess whether patients registered to noninsured health benefits (NIHBs) (all of whom are Indigenous) experience different risk of these complications than patients not registered to NIHB. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included paediatric patients (<18 years) treated at a tertiary otolaryngology referral centre serving a large population of Indigenous Peoples, including a subset registered to the NIHB. Patients with cleft palate who underwent tympanostomy tube insertion and had at least 12 months of follow-up with pre- and postoperative audiograms were included. Primary outcomes were the prevalence of tube-related complications and the rate of repeat tympanostomy tube insertions. Results: A total of 278 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at tube insertion was 12 months. Of these, 141 (51%) were male, and 30 (11%) were registered to NIHB. The complication rate was 21% (n = 59), with refractory otorrhea being the most common complication (n = 50, 18%). Repeat tympanostomy tubes were required in 116 patients (42%), and 33 patients (12%) required more than 2 sets of tubes. Patients registered to NIHB were significantly more likely to experience complications and have persistent hearing loss on postoperative audiogram but were not more likely to receive repeat tympanostomy tubes. Conclusion: Patients registered to NIHB were disproportionately affected compared with patients not registered to NIHB, and despite being at higher risk for complications, they were not more likely to have repeat procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.