Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266194›Full record

ArticleHumanities & social sciences communications2026

The unheard path: carer loneliness and epistemic injustice in critical and historical view.

Fred Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Humanities & social sciences communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fred CooperUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article analyses a corpus of longitudinal interview evidence on the experiences of family carers in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic, and situates them in a longer historical, philosophical, and political discussion. Drawing on feminist epistemology, medical humanities, loneliness studies, and interdisciplinary scholarship on care, it rethinks carer loneliness and epistemic constraint as the mingled products of a series of overlapping abandonments, across short, medium, and long-term temporalities. Discussing loneliness, touch, solitude, shame, and social and cultural invisibility in the stories told by carers about their lives before and during COVID, it then pulls focus to a historical analysis of post-war discourses on care, which simultaneously noted and naturalised the exclusion of carers from emergent imaginings of health and thriving.

Indexed as

Health humanitiesHistoryMedical humanitiesPhilosophySocial policySociology

Identifiers

PMID42266194
PMCPMC13243131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.