Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266146›Full record

ReviewDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2026

Endoscopic Assessment and Management of Colorectal Serrated Lesions: Current Comparative Practice, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Toshio Uraoka, Yasushi Yamasaki, Kenichiro Imai, Hirohito Tanaka, Keigo Sato, Yuki Itoi, Hiroko Hosaka, Shiko Kuribayashi, Hemchand Ramberan, Yoji Takeuchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Toshio UraokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-4331
Yasushi YamasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2992-9863
Kenichiro ImaiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9257-5842
Hirohito TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Keigo SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Yuki ItoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Hiroko HosakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Shiko KuribayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-552X
Hemchand RamberanSentara Health Gastroenterology Specialists, Newport News, Virginia, USA.
Yoji TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-298X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serrated-carcinoma pathway accounts for approximately 15%-30% of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC) and contributes disproportionately to right-sided interval cancers. Key precursors include sessile serrated lesion (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD); traditional serrated adenoma, and also the recently described superficially serrated adenoma which warrants attention. However, high-quality evidence guiding best practice for resection indications, technique selection, and post-resection surveillance intervals remains limited and varied, with differences between Western and Japanese guidelines. This narrative review integrates clinicopathologic and practical perspectives to provoke further discussion for a standardized universal guideline approach. For nondysplastic SSLs, cold polypectomy techniques may be considered in selected lesions with defined margins and detailed documentation, whereas those with suspected dysplasia, non-lifting or scarring, requiring en bloc resection, favor endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection for accurate histopathology. Surveillance should be prioritized by histopathology and completeness of resection, with an index shorter interval assessment of the resection site at 6-12 months after piecemeal resection or when margins are involved or indeterminate, followed by risk-tiered intervals. Because the detection of serrated lesions determines resection type, quality and surveillance interval, endoscopists should standardize bowel preparation, lesion assessment after mucus cap clearance, use image-enhanced endoscopy when appropriate, and apply targeted dye spray when borders are indistinct. Finally, we outline priority research; prospective, serrated lesion-focused cohorts and trials-to ascertain durable outcomes of cold snare resection strategies, refine surveillance intervals, and reconcile regional practice differences, with the overarching goal of reducing post-colonoscopy interval CRC and overall CRC incidence with high-quality colonoscopy.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsHumansColorectal cancerendoscopic resectionserrated lesionsessile serrated lesionsessile serrated lesion with dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID42266146
PMCPMC13250670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.