Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266128›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2026

Buddy operating in gynaecological endoscopy: what should this model of surgical practice look like?

Lina Antoun, T Justin Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lina AntounDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-0576
T Justin ClarkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-1062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Buddy operating" is a subtype of dual operating described in the Clark model, where two surgeons of comparable proficiency collaborate during complex procedures. Potential benefits include improved surgical efficacy and safety, shared intraoperative decision making, enhanced skill development, and improved surgeon wellbeing. However, implementation must be justified given resource constraints and potential impacts on surgical training. We propose that buddy operating should be selectively applied to clearly defined complex cases, supported by governance frameworks, structured protocols, and outcome monitoring. Importantly, buddy operating must be distinguished from supervisory training. Future research should evaluate its effects on clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, surgeon health, and access to training opportunities.

Indexed as

Gynaecologylaparoscopic surgerymentorshippatient safetysurgical trainingworkforce resilience

Identifiers

PMID42266128
PMCPMC13285324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.