ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2026
Radiofrequency for the treatment of pilonidal disease: results of a French prospective pilot study.
Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05855733 (Radiofrequency Treatment for Pilonidal Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Radiofrequency Treatment for Pilonidal Disease : Clinical Investigation on Safety of Use, Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMinimally invasive techniques are increasingly applied in the management of pilonidal disease. While laser therapy is well established, radiofrequency (RF) represents a newer alternative with theoretical advantages. However, no prospective data have yet been published on its use. This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction associated with RF treatment for infected pilonidal sinus.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, single-center pilot study including consecutive patients treated with RF between March and December 2023. The procedure was performed under spinal or general anesthesia in an outpatient setting using a radial RF probe (25 W, 4 MHz) following mechanical debridement. Patients were followed up at 15 days and at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included healing rate, predictors of failure, postoperative pain, return to activities, and patient satisfaction.
resultsForty-four patients were enrolled (median age, 25.5 years; 31 men, 70.5%), of whom 38.6% had undergone previous surgery. The median operative time was 12 minutes. No major complications occurred, and minor early events were reported in 6.8% of cases. Complete healing at 6 months was achieved in 77.3% of patients. Failure and recurrence rates were 13.6% and 9.1%, respectively. A history of prior surgery significantly increased the risk of failure (odds ratio, 0.2; P=0.005). The median peak pain score was 2 out of 10, with a median duration of 2 days. Overall, 33 patients (75.0%) were very satisfied, and 40 (90.9%) stated they would undergo the procedure again or recommend it to others.
conclusionRF appears to be a safe, minimally invasive outpatient treatment option for pilonidal disease, demonstrating promising efficacy, minimal postoperative pain, and high patient satisfaction. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05855733.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.