ReviewAnnals of coloproctology2026
Two lives, one fight: navigating rectal cancer in pregnancy with multidisciplinary precision.
Review in Annals of coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal cancer during pregnancy represents a clinical paradox in which the instinct to protect new life directly intersects with the urgency to preserve another. With an incidence of approximately 1 in 13,000 pregnancies, this rare condition challenges not only clinical decision-making but also the ethical and emotional dimensions of contemporary medical care. A 32-year-old primigravida at 26 weeks of gestation presented with rectal bleeding and was diagnosed with stage T4bN+M0 rectal adenocarcinoma. Despite the conventional recommendation of pregnancy termination in such circumstances, the patient expressed a strong desire to continue the pregnancy. A multidisciplinary team comprising colorectal surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and maternal-fetal medicine specialists developed a unified and coordinated treatment plan. The patient received neoadjuvant CAPOX (capecitabine [Xeloda] and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy during pregnancy, underwent cesarean delivery at 36 weeks of gestation, and subsequently completed postpartum chemoradiotherapy followed by curative laparoscopic oncologic resection. The child was delivered healthy, and the mother remained disease-free at a 5-year follow-up. This case demonstrates that life-threatening malignancy and ongoing pregnancy can coexist without compromise. Through carefully timed interventions, close cross-specialty collaboration, and respect for patient autonomy, both maternal and fetal outcomes were excellent. Within the evolving landscape of personalized cancer care, this case challenges outdated paradigms and reframes pregnancy not as a contraindication, but as a clinical variable that can be managed with precision and compassion. In addition to this illustrative case, we provide a focused review of the current literature to guide clinicians navigating this rare and complex clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.