ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Co-Designing an Easy-Read Adult Social Care Outcomes Measure for Older People: Approach to and Reflections on Involving People Living With Dementia and Their Supporters.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the UK, over half a million older people rely on publicly funded social care services to support their daily living needs. It is crucial to measure the quality of these services to ensure they meet the needs of those they support. The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) was developed to assess social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL; Netten et al., 2012). However, many older individuals, particularly those living with dementia, face difficulties completing standard questionnaires (Aznar et al., 2021).
aimThis project aimed to enhance the accessibility of the ASCOT toolkit for older people, enabling more people to self-report their experiences of social care.
methodsWe employed a co-design methodology, bringing together a working group of older adults, primarily those living with dementia, along with their carers/supporters, to adapt the ASCOT toolkit. The adaptation process involved six working group meetings. In between these meetings, three rounds of cognitive testing (Meadows, 2021) with 25 participants who had difficulties completing traditional questionnaires also took place, with findings brought back to the working group after each round, so they could further refine the toolkit in light of cognitive testing results.
resultsThe final adapted version of the ASCOT toolkit differs significantly from the original. The cognitive testing results demonstrate a considerable reduction in challenges experienced by participants between testing rounds, indicating a more accessible and user-friendly tool. IMPLICATIONS: The findings from this project demonstrate that co-designing outcome measures with older people, particularly those living with dementia, is both feasible and impactful. This work offers a replicable model for creating inclusive, accessible tools that amplify the voices of service users. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: 8 older people, including those living with dementia, have co-designed the new version of the tool over 6 meetings. Further meetings took place to jointly design dissemination materials. Working group members have co-presented project findings at conferences and events, and two members have co-authored this article. PPI were involved from the funding acquisition stage of this project. Two PPI members who were not part of the working group were part of the project steering group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.