ArticleThe Permanente journal2026
Serious Illness and Health Care Threats to Personal Legacy Goals.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHigh-quality care for people with serious illness requires understanding what matters most. Although goals-of-care conversations may emphasize values and treatment preferences, patients hold goals related to identity, relationships, and legacy; how they wish to be remembered and what they hope to leave behind. These legacy goals can shape treatment choices, yet they are rarely elicited in clinical care. The authors explored how people living with serious illness consider legacy, how legacy goals inform care decisions, and how health care supports or constrains them.
methodsThe authors conducted 1-hour telephone interviews with Kaiser Permanente Washington members who received at least 1 palliative care consultation in the prior year. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with iterative coding and consensus.
resultsFive themes emerged: 1) participants actively planned for legacy, with legacy goals often clarified by serious illness; 2) illness and its care introduced threats to legacy goals; 3) financial strain and insurance coverage were major threats; 4) participants believed their care would differ if teams understood their legacy goals; and 5) participants wanted to communicate their legacy goals to their care teams. DISCUSSION: Legacy goals often become more salient after a serious illness diagnosis, helping people clarify priorities and values as they approach end of life. Integrating legacy-related conversations into palliative care may enhance person-centered care by addressing identity, relationships, and meaning alongside medical preferences.
conclusionSerious illness and its treatment can jeopardize patients' ability to achieve legacy goals. Interventions to elicit and support legacy goals may improve high-quality palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.