Observational studyDeutsches Arzteblatt international2026
Epidural Analgesia in Labor: A Nationwide Evaluation of Utilization in Germany.
Observational study in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLumbar epidural anesthesia (LEA) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of pain during vaginal delivery. Despite procedural advances and high maternal satisfaction in surveys, the extent of LEA utilization in Germany and its trend over time remain unclear.
methodsWe carried out a nationwide retrospective cross-sectional analysis of routine administrative data reported by German hospitals from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2023. Births were identified by ICD-10 and OPS codes. The data set included all women in Germany who were admitted to a hospital for childbirth. The data analysis was descriptive, with subgroup stratification by mode of delivery. The primary endpoint was the use of LEA for delivery.
resultsOf the 6.6 million deliveries recorded, 4.5 million (68%) were vaginal. LEA was used in 1.2 million deliveries (18.4% of the total), including 922 510 in vaginal deliveries (20.5% of all vaginal deliveries). Women who received LEA were younger on average (median age 30 versus 31 years). LEA utilization was relatively stable throughout the study period. Women undergoing vaginal delivery were more likely to receive LEA if they had documented pre-existing conditions or comorbidities.
conclusionThe level of LEA utilization in Germany is stably low compared to other high-income industrialized countries. Better prenatal maternal education and standardized counseling on pain management options can raise awareness of this method of obstetrical analgesia and increase its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.