Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265912›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026

Effectiveness of Amenamevir Vs. Valacyclovir in Preventing Herpes Zoster-Related Hospitalization and Complications: A Target Trial Emulation Using a Large Japanese Claims Database.

Yasuhiro Kano, Yuya Kimura, Hideo Yasunaga

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasuhiro KanoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-2859
Yuya KimuraDepartment of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-0596
Hideo YasunagaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6017-469X

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 23AA2003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amenamevir is a novel anti-herpes zoster drug that is increasingly used in Japan because of its once-daily administration and lack of renal dose adjustment requirements. However, evidence of its clinical effectiveness is limited. This study aimed to estimate the clinical effectiveness of amenamevir vs. valacyclovir in preventing zoster-related hospitalizations and complications. Using a nationally representative claims database from 2017 to 2024, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with a new-user, active-comparator design. We included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with uncomplicated herpes zoster who initiated amenamevir or valacyclovir treatment. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to adjust for differences between patients prescribed amenamevir and valacyclovir. The primary outcome was 30-day zoster-related hospitalization. The secondary outcomes included diagnoses of zoster-related complications (zoster encephalitis, zoster meningitis, disseminated zoster, and zoster ocular disease) and acute kidney injury. In total, 67 912 individuals (38.2% male; mean age, 70.1 years) were included. After overlap weighting, baseline covariates were well-balanced between the groups. The risk of 30-day zoster-related hospitalization was similar between amenamevir and valacyclovir users (0.73% vs. 0.73%; risk ratio [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.20). For secondary outcomes, zoster encephalitis (0.02% vs. 0.01%; RR, 2.09; 95% CI, 0.62-7.10), zoster meningitis (0.04% vs. 0.02%; RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.89-6.09), and disseminated zoster (0.13% vs. 0.10%; RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.79-1.97) did not differ significantly between the groups. However, amenamevir was associated with a higher risk of zoster ocular disease (0.84% vs. 0.67%; RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49) and a lower risk of acute kidney injury (0.02% vs. 0.09%; RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.53). Based on our findings, amenamevir may be a useful option for herpes zoster, particularly in clinical settings where timely assessment of renal function is not available. However, caution is warranted regarding possible increases in ocular complications.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsHerpes ZosterHospitalizationOxadiazolesValacyclovirAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsASP2151OxadiazolesValacyclovir

Identifiers

PMID42265912
PMCPMC13435107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.