ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Laterally Oscillating Trajectory for Undersampling Slices: LOTUS.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWhile spiral sampling offers SNR advantages for diffusion MRI, its acceleration with simultaneous multislice remains relatively unexplored. This study introduces Laterally Oscillating Trajectory for Undersampling Slices (LOTUS), which is a 3D spiral-like k-space trajectory that aims to minimize g-factor via controlled incoherent aliasing. To aid in validation, we introduce a constrained reconstruction approach that enables robust pseudo-multiple replica g-factor estimation for iterative non-Cartesian reconstructions.
methodsSimulated data sampling of a numerical phantom was performed using LOTUS and several acquisition schemes proposed by others to quantitatively compare the resulting image quality when compared to a known ground truth. Diffusion-weighted in vivo brain data from two subjects was acquired with two in-plane acceleration factors (2× and 4×) and two slice acceleration factors (2× and 4×). Estimated g-factor maps and fractional anisotropy maps were calculated to quantitatively and qualitatively compare trajectory performance. For both simulation and in vivo, reconstructions both with and without compressed sensing were utilized.
resultsSimulations generally showed decreased g-factor (20%-31%, depending on trajectory, at highest undersampling rate) and improved reconstruction accuracy (mean-square error, structural similarity index, and entropy metrics) for LOTUS compared to the other trajectories. The in vivo acquisitions demonstrated g-factor benefits and qualitative image quality improvements that mirrored the simulation results. For both simulation and in vivo, improvements for LOTUS increased for higher numbers of simultaneous slices.
conclusionBy enabling higher rates of slice acceleration, LOTUS shows promise to decrease scan time, which is especially beneficial for diffusion MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.