In one paragraphArticle in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
9 authors.
Mirjam Bhm DuijvestijnDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8074-199X Els M BroensDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-6115 Nancy Nmp SchuurmanDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-4530-4241 Johannes Cm VernooijDivision of Farm Animal Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2646-9216 Judith Ma van den BrandDivision of Pathology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8420-5406 Jaap A WagenaarDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Frank Jm van KuppeveldDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5800-749X Josanne H VerhagenDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3133-5228 Cornelis Am de HaanDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4459-9874 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
ObjectivesCats are susceptible to highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 clade 2.3.4.4 (HPAI H5) and human new pandemic H1N1 (H1N1
Indexed as
Cat DiseasesInfluenza A virusInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCatsFemaleHumansNetherlandsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralAvian influenzainfluenza A viruspandemic preparednessserosurveillancezoonosis
Identifiers
PMID42265865
PMCPMC13379668
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390