ArticleVeterinary research2026
Variation of rabbit serum IgA in relation to RHDV vaccination and infection: implications for serological diagnosis and epidemiological investigations.
Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) is a highly pathogenic and contagious disease caused by RHD virus (RHDV) and RHDV type 2 (RHDV2), two distinct Lagovirus europaeus belonging to the Caliciviridae family. Serological investigations have been widely and successfully used on both wild and farmed rabbit populations. However, interpreting serological data remains uncertain, especially for IgA results in previously infected or vaccinated rabbits. The first part of this study reports the results of two independent vaccination experiments that demonstrated (a) serum IgA was present only in trace amounts and for a few weeks in about half of the vaccinated rabbits and (b) the serological profile of vaccinated rabbits changed significantly, with a marked and rapid increase in IgA, only when they were challenged with live RHDV administered orally. The second part of the study was carried out on a farm over 3 months, during which an RHDV outbreak unexpectedly occurred. We repeatedly sampled nine multivaccinated does, finding constant and medium-to-high levels of IgA in only three of them, namely the oldest ones, which had already been present a year and a half earlier during a devastating RHDV2 epidemic. At least one of the does became IgA positive, coinciding with the RHDV outbreak. A parallel survey on 61 young rabbits living in separate sheds on the farm showed a high percentage of IgA-positive rabbits in just one shed. Overall, our findings definitively demonstrate that vaccinations do not induce serum IgA, except in previously infected rabbits, and that IgA can be used as a marker of RHDV reinfection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.