ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Semi-field experiments and sibship analyses reveal larval habitat size preferences and skip oviposition behaviour in female Anopheles arabiensis.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the turn of the century, long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) have played a major role in malaria control. However, the effectiveness of these tools is declining due to the development of insecticide resistance and other factors, creating an urgent need for complementary strategies. Larval source management (LSM), through the application of biological larvicides or the autodissemination of larvicides by ovipositing female mosquitoes, offers alternative avenues to target malaria vectors. Predicting the effectiveness of such approaches requires a detailed understanding of oviposition site selection behaviour in female Anopheles gambiae sensu lato. This study investigated the oviposition strategy of female Anopheles arabiensis in relation to aquatic habitat size under semi-field conditions in south-central Tanzania.
methodsAn array of twelve alternating small (30 cm diameter, 20 L capacity) and large (60 cm diameter, 40 L capacity) artificial larval habitats was established in two compartments of a semi-field system. In quadruplicated experiments, forty wild gravid An. arabiensis females were released into each compartment and allowed to oviposit in their preferred habitats. The resulting third-instar larvae were collected, counted and preserved in ethanol. Larvae from one replicate were subjected to DNA extraction and microsatellite genotyping. Sibship analysis using Bayesian-likelihood methods (COLONY software) was conducted to reconstruct individual female oviposition behaviour.
resultsRather than distributing eggs in proportion to habitat size, An. arabiensis females significantly preferred smaller habitats. Sibship analysis showed that 49.2% of females skip-oviposited across two to four habitats, while others deposited eggs in only one. Skip-ovipositing females laid more eggs overall, but fewer eggs per habitat, and were more likely to alternate between small and large habitats than to use habitats of the same size, consistent with a potential bet-hedging strategy.
conclusionsGravid An. arabiensis females exhibited a strong preference for smaller aquatic habitats and frequently engaged in skip-oviposition. These behavioural traits have potential implications for optimising larval-stage vector control tools, particularly those based on autodissemination and attract-and-kill strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.