ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Menstrual status and bone health in athletes from different sports - a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is linked to low energy availability, menstrual disturbances (MD) and low bone mineral density (BMD; Z-score < -1.0). The prevalence of these symptoms across sports and their interrelationships requires further investigation. This study aimed to 1) investigate the prevalence of severe MD and low BMD among athletes from different sports, 2) compare BMD Z-scores at lumbar spine, total hip and whole-body between regularly menstruating (RM), severe MD and hormonal contraceptive (HC) users, and 3) examine factors related to BMD among endurance athletes, including menstrual status, athletic caliber and sport-specific loading characteristics.
methodsRetrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from seven projects included 411 women from 34 sports (endurance: n = 257; non-endurance: n = 154). BMD was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Menstrual status was defined by the three-step method, cycle tracking or questionnaire, and categorized as RM, severe MD or HC. Endurance sports were further grouped by loading characteristics (very low, low and medium).
resultsAmong non-HC users (51%), the prevalence of severe MD was 37% in endurance, 34% in ball sport and 36% in power- and technical- sports. BMD was not different between menstrual status groups at either lumbar spine (P = 0.334), total hip (P = 0.079) or whole-body (P = 0.164). Endurance athletes had lower lumbar spine BMD Z-scores than non-endurance athletes (-0.0 ± 1.0 vs 1.2 ± 1.2, P < 0.0001), with a higher prevalence of low BMD (17% vs 2%, P = 0.015). Total hip BMD Z-scores were lower in endurance than non-endurance athletes (0.6 ± 0.9 vs 1.4 ± 1.2, P < 0.05 for age < 27). Among endurance athletes, neither loading characteristics nor athletic caliber were associated with BMD. However, endurance athletes with severe MD had lower total hip BMD Z-scores compared to RM athletes (P = 0.008) and HC users (P = 0.021).
conclusionsThe prevalence of severe MD did not differ between sport types. Overall, BMD Z-scores did not differ across menstrual status categories. However, endurance athletes had lower BMD, with total hip BMD being lower in those with severe MD. Heterogenous menstrual assessment methods across the projects included in this study may have impacted the results. Future research should integrate comprehensive REDs assessments including detailed data on menstrual status, training history, bone-loading impact and injuries in female athletes from different sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.