Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42265721›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Predictors of gingival margin migration after fixed orthodontic treatment: a linear mixed model analysis of labial and lingual surfaces.

Suheyla Kaya, Dilara Kahraman, Aybuke Ensarioğlu, Banu Mert, Arzu Ari Demirkaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suheyla KayaFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Türkiye. suheyla.kaya@iuc.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-9263-6211
Dilara KahramanFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1442-7913
Aybuke EnsarioğluFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9704-7205
Banu MertFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6849-9264
Arzu Ari DemirkayaFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6039-5433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the influence of clinical periodontal, radiological, and demographic factors on gingival margin migration after fixed orthodontic treatment using linear mixed model analysis, with separate assessments of labial and lingual surfaces.

methodsThis retrospective single-cohort study analyzed pre and post treatment changes in 88 patients who underwent orthodontic treatment without a non treated control group. Patients were periodontally healthy based on the absence of bone loss on panoramic radiographs and three dimensional intraoral scans. The mean age was 19.25 ± 7.46 years, and measurements were performed on mandibular anterior teeth. Clinical crown length and keratinized tissue width were measured using three dimensional intraoral scans, and cephalometric variables were obtained from lateral radiographs. Gingival margin migration was defined as the change in clinical crown length from before to after treatment. Predictor variables included dental crowding, alveolar ridge width, incisor mandibular plane angle, gonion-menton-sella-nasion angle, symphysis morphology, age, sex, treatment duration, and keratinized tissue width. Linear mixed models were used to assess gingival margin migration across all surfaces and separately for labial and lingual surfaces, using baseline and treatment related changes as predictors.

resultsOf 530 screened patients, 88 were included (72% female). In baseline models, keratinized tissue width, dental crowding, and sex were significant predictors of gingival margin migration. Lingual migration was additionally associated with incisor mandibular plane angle, symphysis morphology, and age. On the labial surface, incisors showed more coronal gingival margin position than canines relative to baseline. In models based on treatment related changes, keratinized tissue width, dental crowding, and age were consistent predictors across all surfaces. Labial margins showed more coronal position than lingual margins, while lingual migration was negatively associated with changes in incisor mandibular plane angle. Changes in keratinized tissue width had the strongest effect.

conclusionsBaseline keratinized tissue width and its increase during treatment were the strongest predictors of gingival margin stability. Dental crowding, incisor inclination, and symphysis morphology showed surface and tooth specific effects, whereas alveolar crest width had no significant impact.

Indexed as

GingivaAdolescentAdultCephalometryFemaleHumansIncisorLinear ModelsMaleMalocclusionMandibleRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultDigital ImagingGingival MigrationOrthodontic TreatmentRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID42265721
PMCPMC13289094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.